Last week’s partial court victory for Ripple Labs against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) provided a sense of relief for the XRP Ledger project, which has long been under a regulatory cloud. However, criticisms from blockchain purists persist, claiming that XRPL’s technological design makes it too centralized compared to other blockchains.
Experts argue about XRPL’s design
Derived from Bitcoin but based on early 2000s concepts, XRPL operates with a trade-off that allows a smaller group of “validators” or key operators to control its central transaction-processing mechanism. This centralization grants benefits such as enhanced security, faster transaction speeds, and higher throughput. However, the downside is an increased susceptibility to the influence of major players and the risk of single points of failure.
Despite these criticisms, XRPL remains an intriguing project and a pioneer in the blockchain industry. It boasts a market capitalization of $42 billion for its native token XRP, making it the fourth-largest among thousands of cryptocurrencies. Its appeal has attracted partnerships with major banks, including Bank of America. XRPL has been ahead of its competitors in some aspects, with native integration of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and upcoming smart contract-like functionality.
Additionally, third-party sidechains are beginning to emerge on the platform. Initially conceived as “RipplePay” by Canadian programmer Ryan Fugger in 2004, XRPL was initially not a blockchain project but a peer-to-peer payment network focused on convenience and security. In 2011, Fugger sold RipplePay to Jed McCaleb, Arthur Britto, and David Schwartz, who merged it with their new payment system inspired by Bitcoin.
The trio’s mission was to bridge blockchains with traditional finance by offering faster transactions, lower fees, and reduced energy costs. Eventually, their company, initially called “OpenCoin,” became Ripple Labs. However, Ripple’s reputation in the cryptocurrency community has been complex. When XRPL was just Fugger’s project, it had a generally positive reputation within the nascent crypto community. Yet, when McCaleb and his team took over, the project faced criticism from purists and maximalists in the Bitcoin community.
Ripple explains the XRP’s role in the crypto sector
Unlike Bitcoin, which aimed to disrupt traditional banking with a decentralized approach, Ripple focused on improving the existing financial system incrementally. Initially designed for quick and cheap cross-border payments, the token was intended to serve as a bridge asset for banks and financial institutions. Over time, Ripple Labs expanded its focus to include additional use cases like Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).
It envisions itself as a wholesale replacement for SWIFT, the messaging network that powers global payments. The division between XRPL’s enthusiasts and its detractors remains pronounced. The XRP Army, an enthusiastic fanbase, supports Ripple’s partnerships with banks and central banks, while critics argue that these partnerships contradict the decentralized nature of payment networks.
As XRPL continues to navigate the ever-evolving crypto landscape, it must strike a balance between centralization and ambition. While it has made significant strides in various areas and achieved remarkable success, the project faces the ongoing challenge of addressing concerns raised by blockchain purists.
Ripple’s project has achieved significant milestones in the crypto space, but its journey has been marked by both triumphs and criticisms. While XRPL’s technological design and centralization have drawn criticism, its ambitions to revolutionize cross-border payments and explore CBDC use cases have garnered support from various financial institutions.
